Lecture Notes

October 08, 2007

Great Depression II: Economics 113: October 8, 2007

The Great Depression II: Keynes and Friedman on the economics:

http://j-bradford-delong.net/2007_ppt/20071008_113_ppt.ppt
http://j-bradford-delong.net/2007_mov/20071008_113_ppt.mov
http://j-bradford-delong.net/2007_audio/113_8_10_07.mp3

October 04, 2007

The Great Depression: Economics 113 (Audio)

The Great Depression: Economics 113 (Audio): American Economic History Lecture for October 3, 2007:

How did the world slide into the Great Depression anyway?

Audio: http://j-bradford-delong.net/2007_audio/113_10_03_07.mp3

Handout: http://delong.typepad.com/aeh/2007/10/the-great-depre.html

October 03, 2007

The Great Depression...

In the twentieth century measured U.S. real GDP per worker increased by nearly 300%. True real GDP per worker probably increased by about one percent per year more--for a total growth over the century of some 700%, perhaps. The fall in the work year with the spread of the eight-hour day, the paid vacation, and part-time work means that total output per workhour probably grew by 850%.

Relative to this--very strong--long- run growth, all of the business cycles of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries are small potatoes. Only the Great Depression is powerful enough to cause any substantial interruption of long-run growth.



Audio: http://j-bradford-delong.net/2007_audio/113_10_03_07.mp3

September 24, 2007

Industrializing America: American Economic History: Econ 113

From 1865 to 1929: Finance, Capital, Labor, Technology

September 24 Large Audio File. Streaming Audio File.

September 26 Large Audio File.

Growth, Industrialization, Wages, and Profits

Labor: Education and Immigration:

  • Immigration

    • Gains to immigrants
    • Gains to native-born consumers
    • Gains to native-born capital owners
    • Losses to native-born unskilled
    • Francis Walker counterfactual...
  • Education

    • Technical education
    • Elementary education
    • High-school education
    • Homesteading the information frontier after 1890...

Capital, Finance, and Technology Intermixed:

  • John D. Rockefeller and company
  • Standard Oil
  • Capital and finance
  • Winner-take-all--or winner-take-much--economies
  • Technology and capital
  • Dilemmas of corporate control
  • J.P. Morgan and company...

From Shafts to Wires:

  • Newcomen and Watt
  • Edison and Tesla
  • Shafts
  • Wires
  • Mass production
  • "Fordism"
  • IWW

September 20, 2007

The Post-Civil War United States

PLACEHOLDER

Audio: http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/2007_audio/113_9_19_07.m4a

Streaming Audio

September 17, 2007

U.S. and Canada vs. Latin America Lecture

What Has Happened in the New World?

Four areas:

  • U.S.-Canada
  • Mexico-Brazil
  • Caribbean + slave Brazil
  • southern cone

U.S.-Canada very rich: rest not so. Why?

  • $80K per worker per year in the U.S. $10K-$20K more common in Latin America..
  • All have (or had) favorable land-labor ratios after conquest and plagues...
  • All had abundant natural resources...
  • Southern cone keeping up with North America until the 1930s--I will not deal with that today...
  • Two lines of explanation: problems of slavery and ex-slavery; problems of mainland Latin America

The Puzzle: We Explain United States Growth as Markets + Resources = Accumulation + Technology

  • But what happens when we go to Latin America?
  • From the perspective of 1700, the United States is a marginal new-world economic area
  • Yet Latin America today lags far behind the United States and Canada
  • To explain U.S. vs. Latin America, you need "institutions"
    • What are institutions?
    • Where do institutions come from?

Three Theories:

  • "Legal origins" (Shleifer et al.)
  • "Tropical diseases and grab and run" (Acemoglu et al.)
  • Engerman and Sokoloff
    • A historians' story--which means, "it's complicated"
    • Legal origins is broadly wrong--or at least overemphasized
    • Grab-and-run due to tropical diseases also greatly overemphasized
    • Factor endowments
      • Indigenous population oppression
      • Resource curse--slavery
      • Key paragraph: "The British colonies in the New World evolve quite distinct societies and sets of institutions.... The majority that failed shared certain salient features with Latin America.... [These features] allowed for average standards of living that were high at that time... [but] less well suited for the realization of sustained economic growth..."

The Details

The Poverty of Riches:

  • All "began" with an abundance of land relative to labor
  • European migrant standards of living 2x or more those in Europe throughout the colonial period--$1000 of today's dollars per capita per year
  • European standards of living 4x those in Europe in slave-staple-hacienda colonies--$2000 of today's dollars per capita per year
  • Staple crops: sugar, coffee, rice, tobacco, cotton easily produced by slave labor in the Caribbean and Brazil. Haiti 3x as rich as United States in 1790?
  • Extensive indigenous populations in Mexico and Peru
  • Less than 20% of Mexican, Peruvian population "white" as of 1800
  • Family farms on the North American mainland. Why?
    • Swann River
    • Slavery in the Connecticut River valley
    • Slavery in New York City *80% of American population "white" as of 1800
  • "Non-white" a proxy for savage economic (and political!) inequality
  • Economic and political equality a very good thing

Advantages of Equality:

  • Land policy
  • Immigration policy
  • (Mercantilist) trade policy
  • Commerce
  • Middle-class demand for manufactures: "American system"

  • Timing of industrialization

  • Education
  • Other human capital: familiarity with technology or markets

September 14, 2007

General Lecture and Other Audio File Archives

For those wanting an easy download of mp3 and m4a files, general Berkeley lecture and other recorded audio archive files for this fall will be at:

http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/2007_audio/

September 13, 2007

And the [Civil] War Came...

Lecture Notes for September 12

Main Headings:

  • Cleanup from last lecture

    • Abraham Lincoln
    • The march south and the radicalization of northern opinion
  • Who were the real slavelords? http://delong.typepad.com/113_F07/20070910_cuibono.pdf

  • Notes on problem set 2: http://delong.typepad.com/113_F07/20070910_ps2.pdf
  • From the War for the Union to the War Against Slavery
  • Reconstruction: the terrorists win in the end
  • Effect on American politics:
    • Since Andrew Jackson, two great parties--the party of property and opportunity; the party of solidarity and safety nets.
    • Both useful (usually); tension healthy (usually)
    • After 1865, for 50 years lots of white northerners who vote Republican because Lincoln freed the slaves
    • After 1865, for 130 years lots of white southerners who vote Democratic because Lincoln freed the slaves
    • Now over, but a strange wild ride while it was going on

Big Quotes:

  • Abraham Lincoln, 1858: I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people ... I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone...

  • Abraham Lincoln, 1858: I agree with Judge [Stephen] Douglas [that the Negro] is not my equal in many respects-certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment. But in the right to eat the bread, without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln-Douglas_debates_of_1858

  • Frederick Douglass, 1876: We are here to express, as best we may, by appropriate forms and ceremonies, our grateful sense of the vast, high, and preeminent services rendered to ourselves, to our race, to our country, and to the whole world by Abraham Lincoln.... He was preeminently the white man’s President, entirely devoted to the welfare of white men. He was ready and willing at any time during the first years of his administration to deny, postpone, and sacrifice the rights of humanity in the colored people to promote the welfare of the white people of this country.... I concede to you, my white fellow-citizens, a pre-eminence in this worship at once full and supreme. First, midst, and last, you and yours were the objects of his deepest affection and his most earnest solicitude. You are the children of Abraham Lincoln. We are at best only his step-children; children by adoption, children by forces of circumstances and necessity.... His great mission was to accomplish two things: first, to save his country from dismemberment and ruin; and, second, to free his country from the great crime of slavery. To do one or the other, or both, he must have the earnest sympathy and the powerful cooperation of his loyal fellow-countrymen. Without this primary and essential condition to success his efforts must have been vain and utterly fruitless. Had he put the abolition of slavery before the salvation of the Union, he would have inevitably driven from him a powerful class of the American people and rendered resistance to rebellion impossible. Viewed from the genuine abolition ground, Mr. Lincoln seemed tardy, cold, dull, and indifferent; but measuring him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, he was swift, zealous, radical, and determined... http://www.teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?documentprint=39


Lincoln First Inaugural; Lincoln Second Inaugural

September 09, 2007

Northern Industry/Slavery Lecture Notes: Econ 113: American Economic History: Fall 2007

Industry

Alexander Hamilton: Debt, Banks, and Manufactures.

U.S. Revolutionary War hyperinflation: $241 million continental dollars worth $1 million gold dollars by the end of the war.

Value of Revolutionary War debt tripled as debt assumption was discussed and debated.

  • Alexander Hamilton believed that an America which owed lots of rich merchants lots of money--an America that "assumed" the debts the states had run up during the Revolutionary War and were not likely to pay--would be a stronger and better America. Why did he believe this?

Megasthenes: the coming of cotton to the Mediterranean...

David Ricardo: Why didn't the U.S. become one big unindustralized Canada?

  • Answer: the tariff

Could the tariff have been good for the country?

  • Answer--yes, if the infant industry argument holds.

What is the infant industry argument?

  • There has to be some benefit--external to the firm and to the worker--from production.
  • Future productivity has to be positively influenced by past production in order to make it beneficial in the long run to upset the Ricardian pattern of comparative advantage.
  • The infant industry argument is plausible, but not certain, for the case of U.S. textile manufacture.
  • Even so, it's not good for the cotton-exporting tariff-paying south.

The history of the cotton textile business: Samuel Slater, Francis Cabot Lowell, Lowell Massachusetts, et cetera...

Peter Temin's article: the American system:

  • The Crystal Palace exhibition
  • What is special about American industry
  • Eli Whitney
  • Interchangeable parts
  • The "American System"
  • Resource-using technological style.

Consequences for post-Civil War industrialization...

Slavery

The Slave Trade: Guns. Slaves. Sugar/molasses/tobacco/cotton. Very profitable. Extraordinarily inhumane

Adam Smith expected slavery to come to a rapid end after 1776.

  • Inefficient--slave has no incentive
  • An incentive-compatible system produces a larger economic pie
  • And people can decide on a system better for everyone--a system that's still unequal, but not as brutal and vicious

Adam Smith was wrong. Why?

What maintains slavery?

  • Extreme cheapness of slaves--makes vicious discipline credible
  • Extreme control--slaves cannot run away
  • Extreme monitoring--easy to see if slaves are working hard
  • Caesar; classical Roman slavery; Arabic slavery; mamelukes

The American South

  • Quick end of indentured servitude
  • The assumption that everyone black was a slave makes control easy
  • Plantation staple crops make monitoring easy?
  • Cheapness? That became a problem after 1807

Still slavery persisted; Domar's argument; free land made it impossible to strike the emancipatory bargain--hence the coming of the Civil War...

The Persistence of Southern Slavery the Result of:

  • Free land (which makes emancipatory bargains unworkable) (Marx: Swann River Colony)
  • Cotton gin (which gives you another staple crop you can grow for which monitoring is easy)
  • Geographical distribution of slavery:
    • Plantation south--slavery
    • Mountain south--not much slavery
    • North--no slavery
    • Border state antislavery--Cassius Clay--get rid of the "Peculiar Institution"--no desire to free African Americans
    • The northern desire to see slavery set on the "course of ultimate extinction"

Ulpian: Roman jurist: Cui Bono? Who Benefits? Who benefitted from the crime of American slavery?

Do comparative statics with a counterfactual world in which cotton was grown using free labor rather than with slaves...

That is the "cotton is king" problem set that will be handed out on Wednesday, and will be due on the 19th

September 05, 2007

My Eyes Are Bigger than My Stomach

Or my mouth is smaller than my eyes. Or something.

The canonical course on American economic history spends:

  • one week on the Spanish conquest
  • one week on Amerindians
  • one week on colonial settlement
  • one week on the American Revolution
  • one week on Alexander Hamilton
  • one week on agriculture in the Old Northwest
  • one week on New England manufactures
  • one week on slavery
  • one week on the Civil War
  • one week on the Gilded Age
  • one week on Populism
  • one week on Progressivism
  • one week on immigration
  • one week on the Roaring Twenties
  • one week on the Great Crash and the Great Depression
  • one week on the New Deal

And we have overshot the end of the semester by three weeks.

I have students who have never lived under any president not named "Clinton" or "Bush," students who graduated from elementary school in 1998.

So I am going to try to greatly compress the first half of the course so as to make space for post-WWII economic history: 1865 by week four!

Northern Agriculture Lecture: Econ 113: American Economic History: Fall 2007

Notes: Northern Agriculture Lecture: Econ 113: American Economic History: Fall 2007

Trying to do something different: a very quick rush through pre-Civil War U.S. economic history to create space in the syllabus to cover post-WWII history.

This week and next week spent trying to do four things:

  • Northern agrarian westward expansion
  • Early industrialization as a result of the tariff
  • Why did slavery--which people like Adam Smith thought was bad even for the slaveholder and was on the way out--grow and strengthen in pre-Civil War America
  • The Civil War--600K dead, 600K maimed; could there have been a better way?

Smithian Growth

The United States--at least the northern United States--as Adam Smith's Utopia:

  • Literate and entrepreneurial population
  • Good legal infrastructure
  • Market exchange
  • Abundant land (means high output per worker)
  • Free land (means high wages)

Constrast with Engerman and Sokoloff's picture of Latin America: populations to exploit and ways to exploit them create extreme inequality... which has poisonous consequences....

And the colonial economy prospers...


Population

1600 1,000
1640 24,000
1680 150,000
1700 260,000
1730 650,000
1780 2,700,000

Output...

How to even claim to measure output? Nevertheless, we have heroic guesses...

Year Y/Pop in 2004$
1710 $800
1775 $1,100
1840 $1,800
1929 $8,300
2004 $40,000

Accumulation

Alice Hanson Jones... data from estates...

Top 20% of households have about 60% of wealth...

Median Wealth Estimates as of 1774:

Region Land Slaves Other
New England $2800 -- $1200
Middle States $4800 -- $3200
South $4000 $1600 $2400

Note that slaves were fully a third of southern wealth, according to AHJ... Big skew in slave ownership...


Politics

Year Settlement/Event
1607 Jamestown
1608 Quebec
1620 Plymouth
1624 New Amsterdam
1630 Massachusetts Bay Company
1643 Swedesboro, Pennsylvania
1640-1660 English Revolution
1689 "Glorious Revolution" in England
1754-1763 French and Indian War

Mercantile System...


American Revolution...

National Population:

1790: 3.9M people, $1100 1840 17.1M people, $1800 1860 31.4M people, $2000

% urban: 5% 1790, 11% 1840, 20% 1860.

"Urban" means "2500 or more"...

City sizes: 1790: NY 33, PH 29, BO 18; 1840: NY 313, Balt 102, NO 102, PH 93; 1860 NY+Brooklyn 1081, PH 565, Balt 212.

Why this pattern? Transport: Erie Canal, C&O Canal, Mississippi-Missouri-Ohio river system. The coming of the railroad to keep NO from surpassing NY... New York Central RR, Pennsylvania RR...

SF in 1860: 15th among American cities with 57K people...

Conquest: Northwest territories, inland southeast and War of 1812, Louisiana Purchase, Florida, Texas, Mexican Cession, Oregon Territory, Alaska "Seward's Folly", Hawaii. Conquest keeps land abundant, hence keeps wages high.

Relatively fast increase in output per capita in the U.S. before 1860. A puzzle that growth was so fast. The puzzle set out for your inspection... Implication: an enormous increase in effective land and natural resources per worker from 1790 to 1860. Population grows. Accessible natural resources grow significantly faster... A handout on growth accounting, resources, and the pre-Civil War U.S.

Alexander Hamilton: Debt, Banks, and Manufactures.

U.S. Revolutionary War hyperinflation: $241 million continental dollars worth $1 million gold dollars by the end of the war.

Value of Revolutionary War debt tripled as debt assumption was discussed and debated.

  • Alexander Hamilton believed that an America which owed lots of rich merchants lots of money--an America that "assumed" the debts the states had run up during the Revolutionary War and were not likely to pay--would be a stronger and better America. Why did he believe this?

Megasthenes: the coming of cotton to the Mediterranean...

Format of the first midterm exam...

David Ricardo: Why didn't the U.S. become one big unindustralized Canada?

Answer: the tariff

Could the tariff have been good for the country?

Answer--yes, if the infant industry argument holds.

What is the infant industry argument? There has to be some benefit--external to the firm and to the worker--from production. Future productivity has to be positively influenced by past production in order to make it beneficial in the long run to upset the Ricardian pattern of comparative advantage.

The infant industry argument is plausible, but not certain, for the case of U.S. textile manufacture.

Even so, it's not good for the cotton-exporting tariff-paying south.

The history of the cotton textile business: Samuel Slater, Francis Cabot Lowell, Lowell Massachusetts, et cetera...

Peter Temin's article: the American system

The Crystal Palace exhibition What is special about American industry Eli Whitney Interchangeable parts The "American System" Resource-using technological style.

Consequences for post-Civil War industrialization...

(Large) Audio File

August 29, 2007

Colonization Lecture: August 29, 2007: Econ 113: American Economic History

Notes: Colonization Lecture: Econ 113: American Economic History: Fall 2007

During the pre-industrial early-modern period, 1400-1700, high Eurasian civilizations projected power across oceans...

  • I. Ming China--Zheng He's prestige voyages

    • 25 K people in an armada of 100 ships
    • Compare to British navy in mid-eighteenth century: 50 K
    • Bring back oddities--giraffe--Qilin--King of Ceylon
  • But...

    • Expensive
    • Does nothing to challenge the view that China is the Central Country
    • Politics leads to shutting-down of Ming Dynasty transoceanic exploration
    • Under the Qing the sea was regarded as a place from which danger came
      • Pirates
      • Ming pretenders
      • Managing the gentry elite in the Yangzi valley and the rest of the Chinese southland was hard enough
        • Peach-blossom fan
  • II. Seaborne Empire

    • Portugal--Holland--Britain (with France trying to get into the game)
    • Invade the Indian ocean
    • Sink everything that moves
    • Acquire monopoly of ocean traffic
    • Build bases
    • Trade--from a highly advantageous position as a monopolist
  • Holland in late seventeenth century:

    • Maybe 50 K people directly and indirectly engaged in East India trade (out of a total population of 4 million)
    • 5% of Dutch GDP
    • Healthy, but not overwhelming effect on the Portuguese, Dutch, and British economies
      • But did have first-order effects on domestic politics
      • Then in the late 1800s the British East India Company makes its bid for power in Inda ... but that carries us too far from our topic
  • III. Conquest and Occupation: Spain in the New World

    • Conquest and plunder
    • Encomienda/hacienda/mining--creation of an elite ruling class
    • Largely uninterested in what we would see as economic development
      • "To serve God, to win glory, and to grow rich"
    • Nevertheless, over time things changed: no longer Spanish would-be aristocrats ruling over Amerindian serfs
  • IV. Slave Raiding

    • The slave trade in historical perspective
      • Gaius Julius Caesar
    • Firearms change things

      • Europeans in West Africa, Middle Easterners in East Africa
      • Trade guns for slaves on the African coast
      • Kings to whom you have sold guns than capture slaves
      • Ship slaves to sugar islands the turn them into a labor force
      • Need (a) firearms, (b) and (c) plantation agriculture, plus (d) a middle class market
      • Similar but much less terrible things going on in eastern Europe at the same time--the "second serfdom"
    • Terrible consequences for African civilizations...

    • Extraordinary potential profitability of slavery: some rough numbers *Consider a small slave ship: 150 slaves--100 survive--surplus value: 100 x 1/4 x 10 yrs = 250 man-years of value
      • Amortized cost of ship: 25 man-years
      • Cost of crew (2 voyages a year): 10 man-years
      • Cost of trade goods (guns): 15 man-years
      • A 5-1 ratio of revenue to cost--but exceptional hazards
        • Cost to your conscience
  • V. Plantation Agriculture on the Sugar Islands

    • Use slaves to grow plantation crops
      • Coffee, sugar, tobacco [chocolate, cocaine?]
      • Digression on pests and parasites
    • Extremely nasty social formations on the sugar islands
    • Extremely profitable.
  • VI. Small-Farmer Settlement

    • Religious motive
    • Company profit motive (except for the Hudson's Bay Company, didn't work)
    • Get-a-farm motive
    Digression on Silver and Spain
  • Allows Carlos V and Felipe II-IV to fight the Wars of the Counterreformation
  • Deindustrializes Spain
  • In the long run, Spain's American empire a source of wealth--and a cultural and industrial curse
  • Miguel de Cervantes and Don Quixote

The sixth--small farm settlement--was, to contemporaries, the least attractive--it was what you did when you couldn't do anything else.

The sixth was also, in the long run, the most productive as far as economic growth is concerned.


Smithian Growth

The United States--at least the northern United States--as Adam Smith's Utopia:

Y = F(A, N/L, H/L, K/L)

  • Literate and entrepreneurial population
  • Good legal infrastructure
  • Market exchange
  • Abundant land (means high output per worker)
  • Free land (means high wages)

Constrast with Engerman and Sokoloff's picture of Latin America: populations to exploit and ways to exploit them create extreme inequality... which has poisonous consequences....

And the economy prospers...


Population

1600 1,000
1640 24,000
1680 150,000
1700 260,000
1730 650,000
1780 2,700,000

Output... How to even claim to measure output?

Nevertheless, we have heroic guesses...

Year Y/Pop in 2004$
1710 $800
1775 $1,100
1840 $1,800
1929 $8,300
2004 $40,000

Accumulation

Alice Hanson Jones... estates...

Top 20% of households have about 60% of wealth...

Median Wealth Estimates as of 1774:

Region Land Slaves Other
New England $2800 -- $1200
Middle States $4800 -- $3200
South $4000 $1600 $2400

Note that slaves were fully a third of southern wealth, according to AHJ... Big skew in slave ownership...


Politics

Year Settlement/Event
1607 Jamestown
1608 Quebec
1620 Plymouth
1624 New Amsterdam
1630 Massachusetts Bay Company
1643 Swedesboro, Pennsylvania
1640-1660 English Revolution
1689 "Glorious Revolution" in England
1754-1763 French and Indian War

Mercantile System...


Audio File

Overheads for August 29, 2007

Colonization

Source: Wikipedia.


Source: Martha Olney.


Source: Census via Walton and Rockoff and Martha Olney.

August 27, 2007

August 27, 2007: American Economic History: UC Berkeley: Lecture Notes

4:10:

Good afternoon. This is economics 113--American Economic History. I am Brad DeLong. The section leaders--GSIs--are Vikram , Marc Gersen, and Adam Jack Gomolin.

We are going to try to save trees this year. So instead of handing out a 30-sheet packet, we are handing out one sheet with web addresses:

http://delong.typepad.com/aeh/: Course Website
http://delong.typepad.com/aeh/2007/08/logistics-econ-.html: Logistics
http://delong.typepad.com/aeh/2007/08/american-econom.html: Syllabus: Readings and Assignments

Throw everything up on the web for reference. But I am not a great fan of Powerpoints. Dim lights--people fall asleep. People don't take notes. We really don't understand that much about education. Best chance is when you are engaged in processing the information.

We are also administratively inept this semester. At the start of August, we in the economics department belatedly recognized that while we had scheduled this class and you had signed up for it, we had not assigned anyone to teach it. Hence a search for somebody qualified to teach this, pliable, and free to teach 4-5:30 MW. Hence me. But the interaction of this process with August vacations means that we are behind in our organization of this course.

Sections: M 9-10A, 71 EVANS; Tu 4-5P, 85 EVANS; W 8-9A, 310 HEARST MIN; Th 4-5P, 85 EVANS; F 2-3P, 5 EVANS; F 3-4P, 5 EVANS.

Economics 113 is an upper-division economics course in the study of the history of the U.S. economy that satisfies the political economy historical context requirement. We will survey over three hundred years of history, but inevitably focus more intensely on those incidents that the instructor finds particularly interesting. This is an economics course: we will spend most of our time looking at events, factors, and explanations, using economics to understand history and history to understand economics. Economics 113 must be taken for a grade if it is to be used toward the requirements for the political economy or the economics major.

My assignments are three: to talk, and to tell you what to read, and to try to get you to think. Your assignments are six: to come to lectures and listen, to contribute to section discussions, to take the exams, to do the problem sets, to write the papers, and to do the web assignments.

GRADING...

A word on the last: the web assignments. It is an experiment. It may be a total flop. You are guinea pigs and since you are guinea pigs I owe you a brief sketch of what I am thinking.

Let us back up for a second to the origins of the university in medieval Italy. The German Emperor Federico II has a problem, as you may suspect given that he is a German emperor and his friends call him Federico. 1000 miles as the crow walks from Hamburg to Palermo...

Needs judges, clerks, administrators...

When eight centuries ago years ago the emperor Federico II establishes the University of Naples and names Roffredo of Benevento as its Rector, he wants one thing: a steady supply of literate bureaucrats to work for him who had been taught that holy scripture and secular prudence both advise that emperors boss popes and not popes emperors. To that end Federico offers low-interest student loans and lavish promises of cushy government jobs to students who come to Naples. (And threatens to confiscate the property and imprison the parents of those who go to school out of state.)

Why? Books... Hand copying... printing... University stays, and lecture stays. But not enough active, not enough interaction...

Hence we are going to dip our toes into the water and experiment a little bit...

WEB ASSIGNMENTS...

LOGISTICS...

SYLLABUS...


Now let's get going:

  • Why care about American economic history?

    • Because we are here; it is important and interesting to know how and why "here" came to be.
    • Because America is special:
      • Special relative to other countries
        • At current exchange rates, six times as well-off as the world average, and thirty-six times as well-off as the bottom quarter.
        • At purchasing power parities, three times as well-off as the world average, and roughly seven times as well off as the bottom quarter.
          • Digression on differences between CER and PPP calculations
      • Special relative to the past
        • We have medicine.
        • We're not as hungry and malnourished.
        • We have many times the number of things: ten times? more?
      • The story of American economic history is a remarkable story: the most successful economic story ever. It's worth studying.
    • And you will learn how to apply some of the economic theory you are learning, and what it is good for.
    • And historical context is important: as baseline, as yardstick, as set of comparisons
      • Marx was wrong when he said that the more advanced presents to the less advanced an image of its own future
      • But the more advanced does present to the less advanced an image of what its present might have been
  • Initial settlement

    • About 15000 years ago the ancestors of today's Amerindians found their way across the Bering Strait and into the Americas...
    • About 1492 Columbus showed up...
    • Catastrophe
    • Walton and Rockoff provide a background narrative to Amerindian civilizations, cultures, and the conquest of the Americas.
    • I want to talk about bigger patterns: what it all means--and to use four articles as springboards...
      • Jared Diamond (2000), "Why Did Human History Unfold Differently On Different Continents For The Last 13,000 Years?" http://www.edge.org/3rdculture/diamond/diamondp1.html) ; (2002), "How to Get Rich" http://www.edge.org/3rdculture/diamondrich/rich_p1.html. Charles Mann (2002), "1491," Atlantic Monthly http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200203/mann. Timothy Yeager (1995), “Encomienda or Slavery? The Spanish Crown's Choice of Labor Organization in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America.” Journal of Economic History 55 (December 1995): 842-59 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-0507%28199512%2955%3A4%3C842%3AEOSTSC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9.
  • 30-100 million people in the Americas in 1490. Compare to 100-150 million each in Europe, China, India. Tenochtitlan at 100,000+ larger than Paris at 70,000.

  • Corn miraculous: 40-to-1 yield ratio, compared to 5-to-1 for contemporary wheat or rye... but corn not nutritionally complete. People get short. Farmers all get short. And farming carries you across a mammoth organizational shift. Thugs with spears. Thugs with incense. Maya, Toltec, Mound Builders, Chimu, Inca, Aztecs

  • Yet: Pizarro: 168 men. Cortez: 500 men.

  • The Indians in Peru, Dobyns concluded, had faced plagues from the day the conquistadors showed up--in fact, before then: smallpox arrived around 1525, seven years ahead of the Spanish. Brought to Mexico apparently by a single sick Spaniard, it swept south and eliminated more than half the population of the Incan empire. Smallpox claimed the Incan dictator Huayna Capac and much of his family, setting off a calamitous war of succession. So complete was the chaos that Francisco Pizarro was able to seize an empire the size of Spain and Italy combined with a force of 168 men. Inca Empire: Smallpox: 1525. Typhus (probably) in 1546, influenza and smallpox together in 1558, smallpox again in 1589, diphtheria in 1614, measles in 1618. We're down to 5 million or so in 1600.

  • Animals and diseases that cross the species barrier...

  • Technological and organizational gradient: corn, potatoes, squash, beans, stone tools, no wheels, no big animals that are domesticable besides the llama...

  • Why this big technological gradient? Two heads are better than one. And writing is really important. As I understood Diamond's agricultural argument, Eurasia's agricultural advantage had multiple causes. The multiple causes were indeed that Eurasia had "better" flora (for our long-run purposes: grains with larger seeds), but more importantly that Eurasia was bigger, and that because Eurasia runs East-West rather than North-South knowledge about effective agricultural techniques diffuses much more rapidly and successfully. Add all these reasons together and you can see why Eurasia is (still) the most densely populated region of the world, and why the world's diet is based on wheat, rye, rice, and their cousins.

  • I thought that one of Diamond's points was that American Indians had done rather well--with corn and potatoes--even though the original flora was not that appetizing (have you ever seen a wild corn plant?). But two heads are better than one. Add Eurasia's large size coupled with easy diffusion along the East-West axis and "better" wild grains and it would have been extraordinary if New World agriculture had been more developed than Old World. Had the American Indians been given enough time, then even with low population densities they might have selectively bred and domesticated sumpweed. But their independent history was cut short in 1500...


5:20: Geography Quiz

  • Boston
  • New York City
  • Philadelphia
  • Washington, DC
  • Charleston
  • Pittsburgh
  • Chicago
  • St Louis
  • New Orleans
  • San Francisco
  • Los Angeles
  • Erie Canal
  • Ohio River
  • Mississippi River
  • Missouri River
  • Lake Michigan
  • Rocky Mountains
  • Appalachian Mountains
  • Rocky Mountains
  • California gold fields

Audio: http://web.mac.com/jbdelong/Brad_DeLongs_iWeb/Coffee_and_Tea_Audio_Podcasts/Entries/2007/8/27_Opening_Lecture%3A_American_Economic_History.html

From Brad DeLong

Search Brad DeLong's Website

  •  

Recent Posts

Brad DeLong's Schedule

About Brad DeLong

Grasping Reality with Both Hands: Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal

Pages