« Rethinking Bank Regulation | Main | Speling »

January 30, 2006

Kudos to Ed Lazear for Being Willing to Sit in the CEA Hot Seat

Congratulations to Ed Lazear for taking on this burden of public service. It won't be easy. He should do a good job. We wish him well:

Bloomberg Printer-Friendly Page : Bush to Nominate Stanford's Lazear to Head CEA, Spokesman Says Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. President George W. Bush will nominate Stanford University economist Edward Lazear to be chairman of his Council of Economic Advisers, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. Lazear, 57, a member of Bush's tax advisory panel last year, would succeed Ben Bernanke at the helm of the CEA. Bernanke was nominated to be Federal Reserve chairman, replacing Alan Greenspan. Unlike Bernanke, who is known as a macroeconomist and a monetary theorist, Lazear has specialized in microeconomic labor issues, worker compensation and productivity.

The CEA chairman will be one of the chief salesmen for Bush's economic agenda, which in 2006 will include an effort to urge Congress to make tax cuts permanent. Bush also is urging Congress to cut spending to reduce the budget deficit and seeking to allay concerns of U.S. workers as the nation competes in the global economy.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brendan Murray in Washington at brmurray@bloomberg.net

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551f08003883400e55220e2468833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kudos to Ed Lazear for Being Willing to Sit in the CEA Hot Seat:

» Greenspan's farewell: One more rate increase from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
As expected, the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates again Tuesday, Chairman Alan Greenspan's las [Read More]

» DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT from MaxSpeak, You Listen!
Something strange happened at The Corner. They let someone who is not a clown say something about economics. Turns out it's my buddy Kevin Hassett at the American Enterprise Institute. I reproduce it in full since it's my favorite comment... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bush's economic agenda, which in 2006 will include the continuing redistribution of wealth upward to the top 1% or donor class. What will Ed Lazear be able to do to stem the tide?

Is it really true that the CEA's chair's job is to be chief salesman for the President's economic agenda. That seems a distortion unique to this administration. I'm not saying that the CEA chair shouldn't be in basic alignment with the administration's goals, but chief salesman seems like a reversal of the way the lines of influence should go.

Brad, there's a scene from Buffy, where she explains "that's not your friend. Your friend is dead. A demon is wearing his body. We're not killing your friend, we're killing a demon".

You saw it with Hubbard, and Mankiw.

You honestly think the job has any meaning, at this point? If he disagrees with their (insane) policy positions, they'll ignore him. If he makes noise about his disagreements, they'll find a way to fire him.

"Bush's economic agenda, which in 2006 will include an effort to urge Congress to make tax cuts permanent. Bush also is urging Congress to cut spending to reduce the budget deficit."

The Bush agenda is to redistribute income and wealth from the poor and working people to the haves and have mores. The strategy is very simple. Use huge tax cuts for the rich to create huge deficits. Then use the deficits as an excuse to cut government programs that benefit working people and the poor.

"Bush's economic agenda, which in 2006 will include an effort to urge Congress to make tax cuts permanent. Bush also is urging Congress to cut spending to reduce the budget deficit."

If they canceled the tax cuts, and reduced military spending to non-aggressive purposes only, wouldn't that put the budget close to a surplus?

I don't think they will cut benefits to the poor. Benefits to the middle class are much, much, more expensive, and are the only place you are going to find a trillion dollars of cuts when the cruch hits.
You do understand that it is a trillion dollars? That 600 billion cut from government expenditures will reduce taxes paid in and necessitate even more cuts?
We don't have a trillion dollars, or close to a trillion dollars, in benefits to poor people in the federal government budget. Not remotely.

wkwillis, chopping aid to the poor won't solve the budget problems, true. But it's something that the right-wing really wants to do *and* it's good politics ('welfare queens', anybody).

"wkwillis, chopping aid to the poor won't solve the budget problems, true. But it's something that the right-wing really wants to do *and* it's good politics ('welfare queens', anybody)."

Yup. The vote to slash Medicaid and screw the poor over yet again is this week, I believe. It doesn't save much money from the budget, but at least worthless parasites will probably die.

Yeah... Bush is naturaly born cowboy...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow Me

Get updates on my activity. Follow me on my Profile.

Search Brad DeLong's Website

  •  

Economics Must-Reads

Categories

Support

This Weblog...

Tip Jar

A Rising Sun

  • "I now know it is a rising, not a setting, sun" --Benjamin Franklin, 1787

From Brad DeLong

Graphs

  • Global Warming
    Matthew Yglesias » Yes, The World is Really Getting Warmer
  • The U.S. Federal Budget Deficit
  • Modern Economic Growth Is a Historically Recent Phenomenon
    20090604 issuu Slouching.VI.doc
  • Escape from Malthusland
    20090604 issuu Slouching.VI.doc
  • The TED Spread Normalizes
  • Recovery in the 1930s
    Path Finder
  • Stock Market: The Graham Ratio
    Path Finder
  • Employment-to-Population
    Path Finder
  • GDP Growth
    Path Finder

Egregious Moderation

Shrillblog