« Federal Reserve: What We Have Here Is a Failure to Communicate | Main | Robert Reich's Blog: On Turning 60 »

June 28, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's a keeper. Wasn't there some sort of tempest over it back before The Beginning of The Second Term? Didn't BoBo try to defend his "observations"?

Oh that David Brooks.

Every Thursday he points out a sweeping but entirely false dichotomy and every Sunday he draws false conclusions from a sweeping but perhaps not entirely false dichotomy.

OK,OK--but let it be known that Huntsville, AL is a high-tech center, and Franklin, TN is the seat of Williamson County, a Nashville suburb that's one of the wealthiest counties in the US. Neither place is exactly down-home--though Williamson is hardly "blue," either. Pottery Barns show up where people have money; and people who have money still tend to vote Republican.

Errr, Brooks' article came out in Dec. 2001 and the Issenberg piece was published in April 2004, based on trips in January, a bit of a lag on fact-checking. And half of the facts are not contradictory. There can be "blue" cities in "red" states and vice versa. One of Goodwin's strongest markets might be a red area, but are most of them?

The annoying element of the Brooks article was that Gore won PA in 2000; Brooks should have travelled to a VA county that went for Bush, as did the state. He went to Franklin county, PA because it was close by. He was lazy.

But Issenberg misses Brooks' point in the article -- the master narratives that the GOP and Dems presented about allegedley "red" areas were both wrong. "Family values" rhetoric did not inspire those in Franklin County and neither did they feel economically deprived.

"I wasn't lying, I was just kidding, sheesh!" is no longer just a gambit of 10-year-olds.

Ok, the piece is no longer timely, but it's well worth disinterring. It's also well worth reading in its entirety, to see just how disinegnuous Brooks is, and just how patronising towards Issenberg when confronted with his own lazy and baseless theorising. He tries to shame her with the "I'm the successful NYT columnist so you'd better be careful if you try to criticise me" approach. (Since when has critiquing an article been "unethical"?)
To her credit, she remains calm and allows him to damn himself with his own words.
But ultimately, it's worth bearing in mind that Brooks' ridiculous and untenable grandstanding as sociologist and cultural interpreter is depressingly common. Homo Sapiens, in general, seems to subscribe willingly to the "three-examples-and-out" model of analysis.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search Brad DeLong's Website

  •  

A Rising Sun

  • "I now know it is a rising, not a setting, sun" --Benjamin Franklin, 1787

Graphs

  • Global Warming
    Matthew Yglesias » Yes, The World is Really Getting Warmer
  • The U.S. Federal Budget Deficit
  • Modern Economic Growth Is a Historically Recent Phenomenon
    20090604 issuu Slouching.VI.doc
  • Escape from Malthusland
    20090604 issuu Slouching.VI.doc
  • The TED Spread Normalizes
  • Recovery in the 1930s
    Path Finder
  • Stock Market: The Graham Ratio
    Path Finder
  • Employment-to-Population
    Path Finder
  • GDP Growth
    Path Finder

From Brad DeLong

Egregious Moderation