Due 5 PM December 4.
Do either (1) or (2):
Pick an issue in contemporary political economy connected with your four-course Political Economy concentration-to-be. Briefly!--in 1400-2000 words--use what you have learned in your historical context courses and in Political Economy 100 and 101 to set out an analytic framework for analyzing that issue.
The reading list for this course has set out a bunch of intellectual "cage matches"--occasions where two smart people assigned disagree about the fundamentals of some issue. Some examples: Hobson v. Schumpeter, Keynes v. Friedman, Fallows v. Scott, Stiglitz v. Keynes, Anderson v. Polanyi, Keynes v. Orwell. Pick an issue, two thinkers assigned in this course who have different views on it, and briefly!--1400 to 2000 worth--referee their cage match: who wins? and why?
What do you expect as far as an intellectual framework?
Posted by: student | December 03, 2007 at 09:42 PM